Follow up to @kambriel’s post. My friend @m0rghul spotted this one today, this photo has made so many rounds… no credit. This is me. This photo was taken my friend Aleksand Villamariona who is now a published photographer (he’s has been featured in...

Follow up to @kambriel’s post. My friend @m0rghul spotted this one today, this photo has made so many rounds… no credit. This is me. This photo was taken my friend Aleksand Villamariona who is now a published photographer (he’s has been featured in Dark Beauty Magazine and places I don’t even know). We were just goofing around that day, I’m surprised this photo - which I published on deviantArt over 10 years ago, WITH a watermark - has ended up on buzzfeed, Facebook pages and here. When my own published posts don’t get this much attention - and neither do my friend’s. Plugging his photography: https://www.facebook.com/aleksandrvillamariona/https://www.instagram.com/aleksandrvillamariona

(Source: decayr, via deathrock)

kambriel:

effulgentpoet:

favorite genres and archetypes:

GHOST STORIES

“Being a ghost must feel like drowning all the time: All you ever do is look up to the sky, forgetting you have anchors.“ - Sean Glatch

The 1st photograph w/the black-veiled woman (which has had the copyright/credit cropped off, and the image manipulated to sepia tone), is a one I (Kambriel) took as a still during our fashion video shoot for “Spine”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvnYbQeONOY & the original photo can be found here: http://kambriel.tumblr.com/post/68108022629/kambrielfashionfilm

Many people think these digital “aesthetic collages” which are so rampant on Tumblr look very witchy/cool, but when they are done in such a way as this which removes all artist credits, copyrights, and attributions, they are harmful (not to mention inconsiderate, and often copyright violations) to all of the artists work being anonymously shared as it creates yet more copies of their work that get reblogged & shared online with no credit whatsoever (or sometimes other people even take the opportunity to credit *themselves* as the “source” of the work ~ I’ve had this happen several times. And no, adding a quote to a “cool” reblogged photo/s does not make one the source for that image). It also prevents any chances those artists have at being contacted for future collaborations, commissions, publications, etc…  I had the above photo published in the book ”Ode to Color” by Lori Weitzner, thanks to the author & publisher (Harper Design) who found it *with* proper credits attached, but these unattributed “aesthetic collages” do not help support artists one bit and to the contrary hurt artists via missed opportunities. If you like something enough to share, maybe like it enough to also take a moment to find the actual creator/source and give the artists credit too. 

I’ve known artists who couldn’t pay studio rent while their (uncredited) photos were getting 100,000’s of likes & reblogs. Please don’t feed into that by reblogging work that’s had all the credits cropped off/omitted unless you can find/add credit back to the original source.

kittencrimson:

Covenant - I Close My Eyes

In the daze of confusion
In the glare of the glow
When the demon comes unbound
I dive under drowning out the sound
In the noise of the silence
In the force of the blow
When the towers tumble down
I sink further going underground

I seek sanctuary
Take me in
Keep me safe
I seek sanctuary
Take my sins
Keep my faith

Squaring circles, cutting ice
Hacking numbers, telling lies
Dreaming nightmares, waking up
Twisting, shouting, dying twice

Little poems from the skies
Fading daydreams falling down
Falling down…

(via crimsonkismet)

puertohurraco:

knightsofthegaytable:

Well, looks like Matilda Jones, aged seven, is the new ruler of Great Britain sorry I don’t make the rules.

I’m really happy for England

(via skusgans)

adreciclarte:
“by Xuebing DU
”
"People do not see you, / They invent you and accuse you."
gwengold:
“ Off For The Sabbot from A Pictorial Compendium of Witchcraft - William Mortenson, 1927
”

gwengold:

Off For The Sabbot from A Pictorial Compendium of Witchcraft - William Mortenson, 1927

(via poisonwasthecure)

dustrial-inc:
“ After reading thousands of romance books, Google’s AI is writing eerie post-modern poetry.“Google had a problem. Their AI engine spoke with grammatical precision and factual accuracy, but its diction remained terse and limp. They...

dustrial-inc:

After reading thousands of romance books, Google’s AI is writing eerie post-modern poetry.

Google had a problem. Their AI engine spoke with grammatical precision and factual accuracy, but its diction remained terse and limp. They wanted it to be more conversational, so they made it read 2,865 romance novels. Now Google has a poet.

In an unpublished paper entitled “Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space,” researchers documented what the Google Brain Team’s pet AI had learned from its steamy binge-fest. The experimental parameters are simple and might actually make for a fun group writing game of some sort. The team gave the AI a starting sentence and an ending sentence. Then they asked artificial intelligence to bridge the two concepts using up to thirteen additional sentences. In a sense, they gave it a beginning and an end and asked it to tell a story. What came out was… a little strange.

[: more :]

coolartefact:
“Discarded rockets of the Apollo 11 voyage found at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean [1536X1025]
Source: http://imgur.com/OUIMJ59
”

coolartefact:

Discarded rockets of the Apollo 11 voyage found at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean [1536X1025]

Source: http://imgur.com/OUIMJ59

"

‘Writing’ (a readable entity) must, in virtue of its essential detachability from every context and from every ‘inscriber’, possess a structural anonymity. The trouble is that, far from supporting it, this feature seems to destroy the very possibility of being with others.

This anonymity is ineliminable, and any reading must pass through it. However, such anonymity is also essentially limited. There is no absolutely anonymous trait because its reading-response entails a singularity of its own (a 'this time’, even if one structured by internal relations to other times). For this reason, such a response is best conceived as presuming, in each case, a spontaneous or originary apostrophe. That is, it is a turn to a living thing as an other in advance of evidence or reasons which might ground it.

Responding to the behaviour of a living thing in this distinctive way is, here and now, to leap to a 'we’. This leap does not, however, constitute the other as other. Rather, it is what first assigns to a living thing the position of a subject. This, then, is the claim: that the individuation of a subject, the 'who’, like the 'what’, stands in need of a reading-response.

"
tisharaquel:
“ The world is hurting today.
Rest in peace Prince.
Legends never die.
1958-2016
”

tisharaquel:

The world is hurting today.

Rest in peace Prince.

Legends never die.

1958-2016

(via thesoftghetto)

originalgiantcontent:
“ Henry Lewis.
”
ghoulnextdoor:
“Inflorescence - Kari-Lise Alexander
”
1 of 336
Themed by: Hunson